>>>>> "NN" == Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
NN> Milan Zamazal wrote:
> I think it's not your copyright, but it's still your copy. So
> `chmod -r' is IMHO just stopping distribution of the copy.
NN> Whi
Thank you all for your answers, I think I can get the point now.
>>>>> "GM" == Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GM> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:03:32PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> The license of a Debian component may not restrict any
t; the case, because it seems that everybody _knows_ why those are
HM> non-DFSG-free.
And additionally it's not of interest in the case, since I've explicitly
said I ask about cases without Invariant Sections.
Please note I understand and agree there are some problems with GFDL.
1]here.
PO> [1] http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html
Unfortunately, the draft position statement doesn't explain, which
section of DFSG is violated in such a case and why. I can understand
there are problems with GFDL, but I can't see the direct DFSG violation
if no Invariant Sections etc. are present.
Could somebody explain this, please?
Milan Zamazal
--
And why?
mmunity whether Czech law allows anything like free license.
Fortunately (?) nobody of official jurisdiction and financial officers
seems to care about it.
Milan Zamazal
--
When you're in a fight with an idiot, it's difficult for other people to tell
which one the idiot is. -- Bruce Perens on debian-devel
ers could
become dependent on XYZNONFREE. No problem with it, but don't use my
work for this purpose.
Though it's a restriction put on non-free software users, my primary
concern would be about free software users. And it would be bad for
them if the GUI development focused on XYZNONFREE
ll classify it `-', since it's not clear what is Debian
distribution or derived distribution and what not.
Milan Zamazal
>>>>> "JH" == john <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JH> Milan Zamazal writes:
>> This is a question. You can look on publication which was
>> received through the program [SWI-Prolog] as a derived work of
>> some kind. I
, but about things pointed out by some particular
license.
Milan Zamazal
ram as you like. Only if you derive some output of
it and want to distribute it (publish), you must satisfy certain
conditions (to give credit).
I don't know whether this requirement has bad implications like the
advertisement clause has. (Are we talking about problems implicated by
the advertisement clause and not about advertisement clause as an evil,
aren't we?)
Milan Zamazal
10 matches
Mail list logo
