Re: Licensing requirements ???

2003-10-10 Thread Michael D Schleif
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:10:10:22:25:34+1000] scribed: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:10:24PM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote: > > As I commented in response to David, I had always assumed that, so long > > as we do not modify source code, GPL allows dist

Re: Licensing requirements ???

2003-10-09 Thread Michael D Schleif
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:10:10:01:09:49+0100] scribed: > On 2003-10-09 20:01:36 +0100 Michael D Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >My client wants to retain all rights to their software, and is not > >willing to release their software in any `free'

Re: Licensing requirements ???

2003-10-09 Thread Michael D Schleif
David Schleef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:10:09:17:01:55-0700] scribed: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:01:36PM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote: > > OK, this is my first foray into a sale-able product, based on `free' > > software. > > Congratulations. > > > I

Licensing requirements ???

2003-10-09 Thread Michael D Schleif
OK, this is my first foray into a sale-able product, based on `free' software. I am working with a company that is writing software that is to be sold to their customers. I have specified Debian as the OS on which this all runs; so, here I am on this list to learn the ropes of `free' software. O