pristine GPL then you as a maintainer have the right to
remove the click-wrap functionality. Usability-wise this would be an
improvement, I think. Hence the question about the original dfsg-status does
not seem to matter much.
IANAL, TINLA. Best regards,
Mark Weyer
wise check the thing emulated.
- Any web browser which does not decline to show non-DSFG-free content.
Disclaimer: I am not a member of the Debian project.
Best regards,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:45:06PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Montag, 7. Mai 2012 schrieb Mark Weyer:
> > Just a quick note: If you are right about the incompatibility of CDDL-1
> > and GPLv3 (others on this list will know if you are), then the
> > combined work is
lity of CDDL-1 and
GPLv3 (others on this list will know if you are), then the combined work is
non-free: Its license terms discriminate against a field of endeavour, namely
developing a parser generator.
I am not a lawyer. Hope this helps,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
tions I see that one might want to make to the music:
- Replace an instrument by something more suitable for a specific epoch.
- Bugfix a single note in the score.
- Remix the entire track.
All of these are possible with what the artist has. None is possible with
the OGG file they provide.
ong all existing forms).
(I always fear that mentioning that consensus might lead people reluctant to
reveal their true sources to "accidentally" delete them.)
Hope this helps. I am not a lawyer. I am not a Debian anything.
Best regards,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-l
copyrighted by yourself, or dual licensed, or ...).
I am not a lawyer. This is not law advice. Best regards,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120326201539.GA1848@debian
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:23:45PM +0100, OlŠµ Streicher wrote:
> Mark Weyer writes:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:19:04AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >> c. The name(s) of all routine(s) in your derived work shall not
> >> include the prefix "iau&q
as non-free, but right now I cannot find it in the DFSG
either.
Just my two cents. I am not a Debian anything (DD,DM,NM,whatever).
Hope that helps,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120213103836.GA1853@debian
stricts use by design.
The above is not intended to convey my opinion on the AGPL, just to prove
that it does in fact restrict use.
Best regards,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 03:47:39PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Mark Weyer wrote:
> > Just to make sure there is no misunderstanding, let me rephrase my
> > scenario: Someone modifies a GPLed work, say a program written in C.
> > Between compiling
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 01:25:57PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Mark Weyer wrote:
> > I always thought that such distribution would be in breach of the
> > GPL, or more generally of copyleft. After all, it is impossible to
> > distinguish, from the outs
from
the outside, between lost and secret sources. And if the
I-want-my-sources-secret person does not care about later modifications, he
might even really delete the sources.
It should not be that easy to weasel out of copyleft.
Best regards,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-l
ly already has created a file of that format by typing its hex
dump [0]. Anyway, the above seem to be definitions of source code in
general, not source code of a specific file.
Best regards,
Mark Weyer
[0] I, for example, regularly use text editors for creating xpm pictures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
dy
addresses the RC bug in time for the release.
And I agree.
Best regards,
Mark Weyer.
IANAL, IANADD
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101114170722.ga3...@debian
t; counterparts) in order to declare something DFSG-free.
> Why is a different standard being applied here?
Am I missing something? I would think that even if in all jurisdictions
the font is non-copyrightable, that still would not imply DFSG-freeness,
only that it is fit for non-free.
Best re
make the view invalid. This has to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
Best regards,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> > I agree with you. In particular, in many cases a single 3D model is used
> > to create many 2D images. If you don't have the model, you need to do
> > the modification many times.
> > And then there is the case of increasing the resolution...
> I don't know if it would be technically possible
Debian package would be in contrib at best (and
that only, if HTK can be shipped in non-free), because the package would
have a build-dependency on HTK.
I guess, in the long run your community needs a free replacement of HTK.
Again, this is only how I understand things.
Best regards,
Mark W
. In particular, in many cases a single 3D model is used
to create many 2D images. If you don't have the model, you need to do
the modification many times.
And then there is the case of increasing the resolution...
> Disclaimers, of course: IANADD, TINASOTODP (and IANAL, TINLA).
S
d to
license proliferation (which is the current plan but I am not very
active on it).
Best regards,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> * Let me know you're using it
I think this makes it non-free.
It fails the desert island and the dissident test.
It also fails DFSG 3, as soon as the upstream author has died.
SDAFP (same disclaimers as Francesco Poli)
Best regards,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
INLA: This is not law advice
IANADD: I am not a Debian Developer
TINASOTODP: This is not a (something) of the official Debian project
I might be wrong, though.
Best regards,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Thanks for your reply.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 05:43:05PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:58:06 +0100 Mark Weyer wrote:
>
> [...]
> > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 01:49:35PM +0100, Mark Weyer wrote:
> > > - Copyleft with source requirement, but shou
Sorry if this breaks threading. Subscription was not as quick as I thought.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 01:49:35PM +0100, Mark Weyer wrote:
> - Copyleft with source requirement, but should not contaminate other
> software.
> - No additional burden on anyone. In particular no require
Debian. If there is a better place to get an answer,
please tell me.
Best regards,
Mark Weyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
26 matches
Mail list logo
