ther people to join that pestering.
Cheers,
Julien
--
Julien Cristau
Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/
Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 19:03:01 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> reopen 678746
> thanks
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:43:12 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 07:34:50 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> >
> > > > The major issue see
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 07:34:50 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > The major issue seems to be that the Joy plymouth theme mixes parts
> > released under CC-by-sa-v3.0 and parts released under GPLv2+.
> > Since CC-by-sa-v3.0 is incompatible with GPLv2+, I would say that the
> > resulting work is
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 00:52:36 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> Any attempt to sue a European distributor would hopefully (a) get shut
> down damn fast, and (b) be a painful experience for the plaintiff.
>
Sounds like wishful thinking to me.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 13:58:10 +0100, Rudolf Polzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the S3TC texture compression scheme is covered by an US patent, as described
> in
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2010-March/005439.html
Lots of stuff is covered by US patents.
Debian mostly disregards paten
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 14:55:31 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> d) get the DOUL-with license changed in time for Squeeze,
That's not going to happen, fwiw.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 08:44:38 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Bojan Sudarević writes:
>
> > 4. Any files that have been modified must carry notices stating the nature
> >of the change and the names of those who changed them.
>
> This is unusual. It seems to be requiring a changelog for *each
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 00:54:22 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Let's tackle this from a different angle. What were the ongoing
> concerns and aren't they solved yet? Who do I need to talk to in order
> to change the license?
>
The DPL.
AFAIK when the logo license was changed, the lawy
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 21:12:24 +0200, Pompee William wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I understand the fact this feature isn't currently used and sounds
> like FUD, but why such a clause does exist for the logo without
> "Debian"? It
> assumes that in case of damages implying the use of the logo, the Debian
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:56:31 +0100, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While conducting routine reading, I saw that debhelper is released under
> the GPL license. Since debhelper includes bits of itself in the package
> it manages, does this mean that I cannot use debhelper for packag
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 14:42:46 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I personally think that *none* of them[1] meet the DFSG.
Yes, you've said that multiple times now.
> Unfortunately, FTP-masters seem to disagree with me...
> Anyone who would like to read further details on my view on the topic
> co
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:44:12 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Karl Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * line 81-83: "OpenVision
> >also retains copyright to derivative works of the Source Code, whether
> >created by OpenVision or by a third party." I think this could threat
> > this s
On Sun, Jul 1, 2007 at 12:49:58 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> If it says "version N or later", we should of course point to the
> *earliest* version to give users the choice which version they want.
>
I don't understand this "of course", nor do I understand how the file we
point to relates to th
On Fri, Mar 9, 2007 at 13:41:35 +0100, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> Julien Cristau escribe:
> > CC-* before 3.0 are non-free
>
> Why exactly!?
See http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary (this is about 2.0, but I
think the same problems apply to 2.5).
Cheers,
Julien
--
On Fri, Mar 9, 2007 at 08:34:30 +0100, Mathieu Stumpf wrote:
> Great, there are 996 songs under CC-by (2.0+2.5) if I just look at
> dogmazic.net.
>
CC-* before 3.0 are non-free, CC-by 3.0 is probably ok, IIRC.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Thu, Mar 8, 2007 at 15:34:32 -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> For some companies I would agree, but as has been said, intel has been
> opensourcing a lot lately, and as that FAQ says, later versions are
> free, which shows they must have some concern.
>
s/free/distributable/
None of the ip
On Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 14:19:19 +, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am looking at the python-sybase software
> (http://python-sybase.sourceforge.net) and it isn't packaged yet in
> Debian. So I had a look at the licence to see if it is possible to
> package. I think it is, I am howev
17 matches
Mail list logo
