Re: Anki logo copyright question

2017-09-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 02:22:20PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > = > > > > Anki's logo is copyright Alex Fraser, and is licensed under the AGPL3 > > like the rest of Anki's code, but with extra provisions to allow more > > liberal use of the logo under limited conditions. > > I read this as a

Anki logo copyright question

2017-09-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi! Anki is licensed under the AGPL3 (GNU Affero General Public License 3), but the logo is licensed with the following conditions. IANAL, and cannot work out whether these make the use more restrictive or less, and therefore whether there is a problem with DFSG-freeness of the logo. Advice woul

Limesurvey in Debian: trademark question

2013-01-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi all, I'm finally having another look at packaging limesurvey for Debian (http://www.limesurvey.org/). Licensing mostly looks fine: It is mostly GPL v2 or later; one bit is PHP, and the rest is LGPL. (There is a reference to a problematic license in the license file, but actually that is outda

Licence query

2008-09-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi all! I'm looking at a package (GLFW, bindings to OpenGL from Haskell) which has the following licence. I think that it is DFSG-free, but I'd like someone else to check over it, as I've not seen a licence exactly like this one before. Many thanks! Julian Licence follows: Copyright (c) 20

Re: Format of the copyright file

2006-03-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 05:31:11PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: > Hi, > > I'm struggling with the policy requirement that the copyright and > licensing information must be in one file debian/copyright, including > the complete license text except for the common licenses. Note that debian/copyright

Re: Bug#143063 acknowledged by developer (Bug#143063: fixed in mmix 1:0.0.20020615-3)

2002-10-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
BUTED. That's where the problem appears to actually lie. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London website: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/ Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/ Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry

Re: Bug#143063 acknowledged by developer (Bug#143063: fixed in mmix 1:0.0.20020615-3)

2002-10-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
ns on the sort of derivative works which may be created. Thanks for the clarification. Now reuploading sgb to non-free as well for the same reason. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Ma

Re: Bug#143063 acknowledged by developer (Bug#143063: fixed in mmix 1:0.0.20020615-3)

2002-10-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:06:00PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Furthermore, mmix agrees with (at least one reading of) point four > > both in letter and spirit: the source cannot be distributed in a > > modified f

Re: Bug#143063 acknowledged by developer (Bug#143063: fixed in mmix 1:0.0.20020615-3)

2002-10-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:18:14AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for adopting the package. However, I really do not understand > > how it conflicts with point four: > > > > DFSG point four: > >

Re: Bug#143063 acknowledged by developer (Bug#143063: fixed in mmix 1:0.0.20020615-3)

2002-10-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
ame as TeX (which is a little less clear, apparently), and the same as much of Knuth's other stuff which is in main. You may want to discuss this on -legal for their view (cc'ing). Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Bug#153257: TeX Licenses & teTeX (Was: Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia)

2002-08-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
* section. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London website: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/ Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/

Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text

2001-12-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
G. In principle, I approve of this idea. I haven't had time to think through the details. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Debian GNU/Linux Developer Queen Mary,

Re: orphaning fetchmail

2000-12-13 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 08:04:15PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 06:51:13PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > [Discussing the future of fetchmail and SSL-enabled versions, there > are two possibilities:] > > > (1) Have an SSL-disabled version in main

Re: [Debian] Majordomo will be removed (fwd)

2000-06-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
of Great Circle Associates, with the following exceptions: This is in direct contravention of condition 1 of the OSD, and completely forbids Debian from including it in main, as there are companies who sell Debian. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: [Debian] Majordomo will be removed (fwd)

2000-06-05 Thread Julian Gilbey
de. The license may require derived works to > carry a different name or version number from the original > software. (rationale) Good point, I'm not certain why it's in non-free. I'm passing it on to debian-legal and the majordomo maintainer for someone with more expertise to answer.

Re: ITP seahorse

2000-05-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
insert encryption software to be restricted too. debian-legal, anyone know the answer to this one? Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux Devel