Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant

2020-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
h the binary. > The key difference here is "public" vs. "recipient". For instance, in the > Desert > Island Test, an entity that is unable to communicate with the island can > neither > receive binaries nor request source distribution, which is fine. I think t

Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant

2020-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
In any case, I will be contacting Apple now and I will ask for their assessment as I don't think we're getting further in this discussion if the goal posts keep moving. Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hfsplus-tools/ -- .''`. John Paul Adrian G

Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant

2020-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
non-free (DFSG ยง6). How is that different from the GPL-2 which mandates three years of distribution for non-personal distribution. I have the impression that you are applying double-standards here. Any commercial product using GPL-2 must share the source code publicly, the same applies to

Re: hfsprogs is not DFSG-Free

2020-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
_hfs.tproj/mount_hfs.c.auto.html > [5] https://opensource.apple.com/source/hfs/hfs-522.0.9/APPLE_LICENSE > [6] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/09/msg00103.html > [7] https://wiki.debian.org/DissidentTest > [8] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant

2020-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 4/20/20 11:04 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote: > * On 4/20/20 10:48 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >>> For sure it fails the Dissident Test. >> Does it? The part which requires the availability of the source changes >> explicitly >> talks about deployment of the so

Re: Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant

2020-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
software for myself and modify it, I'm free to keep the modifications to myself unless I distribute the software, so I don't think the clause would fail the test. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Classification of the APSL as non-DFSG-compliant

2020-04-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
/mount_hfs.c.auto.html > [6] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/09/msg00103.html > [7] http://snapshot.debian.org/package/hfsprogs/ > [8] > https://opensource.apple.com/source/hfs/hfs-522.0.9/APPLE_LICENSE.auto.html > [9] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00573.h