Re: GDB Manual

t have to distribute a little > booklet along with the reference card. The booklet would include the > license and any invariant sections. Thanks for that RMS, it answers one of my chief concerns with the license, it would be nice if an explicit revision back to the 'accompany'

Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)

the freedom to modify without hindrance that was previously enjoyed by the community. John H. -- John Holroyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Demos Technosis Ltd signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)

nd the old BSD license to be so inconvenient, are you promoting a license which mandates even greater inconveniences upon the end user? -- John Holroyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Demos Technosis Ltd signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)

e answer be that distribution of the UTs is not mandatory, so purely functional versions of the package can be distributed, but if the UTs are distributed then they remain unmodifiable? It looks like a sensible compromise to me. -- John Holroyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Demos Technosis Ltd sign

Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files

should be de-bundled from the package and life goes on as normal for us all. Has anybody asked RMS if he is willing to do this? -- John Holroyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Demos Technosis Ltd signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: ImageJ 2 :(

> DBAU & INFM Turin (Italy) > > Meglio un professore povero che un asino ricco -- Meo > > > _____ > For your security, this mail has been scanned and protected by Inflex -- John Holroyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Demos Technosis Ltd signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part