Please vet this modified CC license for uploading FoF music to non-free (was: Re: Could you please forward this proposed license to Teosto?)

2007-05-22 Thread Jason Spiro
On 5/15/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... How about: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/legalcode with 4. d. added saying: You may not publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work except as part of the game and you may not

Re: Could you please forward this proposed license to Teosto? (was: Re: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs)

2007-04-27 Thread Jason Spiro
2007/4/27, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu Apr 26 21:16, Jason Spiro wrote: > I don't know much about how to write licenses, and this is the first > one I have ever written. I figured that everything after the "subject > to the following conditi

Re: Could you please forward this proposed license to Teosto? (was: Re: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs)

2007-04-26 Thread Jason Spiro
Hi Matthew, 2007/4/26, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu Apr 26 16:25, Jason Spiro wrote: > Copyright (C) > > Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining > a copy of this work (the "Work") to use, modify, copy, publish, &g

Could you please forward this proposed license to Teosto? (was: Re: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs)

2007-04-26 Thread Jason Spiro
2007/3/28, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue Mar 27 20:54, Jason Spiro wrote: > 2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote: > >> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a

Re: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs

2007-03-28 Thread Jason Spiro
2007/3/28, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/28/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes that's the contract you have to sign to be part of Teosto (which you > have > to do if you ever want to make a living in Finland as a musician). Ouch. As was indicated earlier this

Re: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs

2007-03-27 Thread Jason Spiro
2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote: > Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a > license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could > get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than

Re: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs

2007-03-27 Thread Jason Spiro
. I doubt Teosto will do that. Cheers, Jason P.S. I am CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] now even though I didn't CC it before. -- Jason Spiro: computer consulting with a smile. I provide software development and training services to clients worldwide. Contact me for a FREE consultation. Satisfact

Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs

2007-03-27 Thread Jason Spiro
://bugs.debian.org/383316 ; the most important message of that thread is http://bugs.debian.org/383316#95 .) The question follows: -- Forwarded message -- From: Sami Kyöstilä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 27 mars 2007 12:43 Subject: Re: FoF package for Debian To: Jason Spiro &

Re: Is the Sybase Open Watcom License ok?

2006-07-11 Thread Jason Spiro
only grants Sybase rights to distributors' patents for the purpose of developing and distributing Open Watcom, not for any other purpose. Am I correct? Kind regards, Jason Spiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- When you open Windows, bugs get in! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Is the Sybase Open Watcom License ok?

2006-07-03 Thread Jason Spiro
superb debugger. Thanks in advance, Jason Spiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sybase Open Watcom Public License version 1.0 1. General; Definitions. This License applies only to the following software programs: the open source versions of Sybase's Watcom C/C++ and Fortran compiler products ("Softwar