Re: Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

2015-05-19 Thread Gabriele Giacone
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:03:48PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:41:02PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: > > > >> [1] https://github.com/libming/libming/issues/42

Re: Bug#785514: RFS: ming/1:0.4.7-1 [RC]

2015-05-18 Thread Gabriele Giacone
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 08:41:02PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Hi Gabriele, Hi Vince, > About the re-licensing of php_ext/ming.c and php_ext/php_ming.h, does > the relevant Github issue [1] mean that the re-licensing wasn't > actually ACK-ed by all the contributors of these files? This sounds >

licenses

2009-12-11 Thread Gabriele Giacone
Hello mentors, The software I'm packaging includes 2 directories which contain files like these [1][2] and considers them as externals. [1] shows a license. Is it good for Debian? Should I only declare in d/copyright that software is "derived from the RSA Data Security, Inc. MD5 Message-Digest Algo

Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages

2009-11-24 Thread Gabriele Giacone
Paul Wise wrote: > According to the comments in one of the URLs in the initial mail in > this thread, the author of the facebook icon specifically created it > for pidgin-facebookchat, so I imagine they specifically licensed it > under the GPLv3 for pidgin-facebookchat folks. > > http://cubestuff.

Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages

2009-11-23 Thread Gabriele Giacone
Eion Robb wrote: >> I believe repacking upstream tarball to exclude logos is the way to go. > > You'll also want to remove the MSN/AIM/etc logos from Pidgin/Empathy/etc > too, since they obviously fall into the same legal grey area. > Unless they're considered "fair use" then everything should be