Debian, this discussion has been pointless since
> its start.
Which results in me not be willing to donate anymore resources to the
debian project, in manpower, network traffic etc.
Thanks for your patience in discussing probably open points.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTE
ot appear in the
Country Chart in part 738 of the EAR, nor are they reflected in
the Commerce Control List in part 774 of the EAR.
Ok - So a reexport from Germany to Cuba for software coming in from
the US need a US License.
Which was what i implicitly always assumed.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5201-669912
Nine nineth on september the 9th Welcome to the new billenium
pgpqexQ4o3fv0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ossible against a very important part of Debian
the package pool and its automatic distribution to mirrors.
The other thing - What about the usage restriction ? Why does noone
comment on that.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5201-669912
Nine nineth
ages maintained by US
citizens. If thats the case why is there no need to have the export
regulation notice on the non-us mirrors today ?
> involved, both for being easier for the Feds to get ahold of, and for
> playing a larger role in the actual export...
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff
only applys to civil usage but not once
someone uses debian to produce chemical missiles. We just accept
the usage restrictions as most people think that THIS restriction is ok.
I thought that free in the DFSG did not mean "Free as long as it fits
the majoritys moral opinion".
Flo
--
Flo
the export of open
source cryptographic software under License Exception TSU to
... (3) design, development, stockpiling, production or use of
nuclear, chemical or biological weapons or missiles."
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5201-669912
Nine nineth on s
dard" of blocking access
to the T7 countries will be held responsible when entering the US
and/or the one actually putting the software in question into
the archive will be held responsible as soon as there is knowledge
of the multi-step export.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff
the rest of the mail isn't relevant to you)."
DPL got life sentence for Isreali hacker bringing CDs to Lybia.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5201-669912
Nine nineth on september the 9th Welcome to the new billenium
pgpZrkEMVP2Ku.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 07:02:19PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [...]
>
> What Florian (conveniently?) cut here is the part that said:
>
> "For mirrors outside the United States there should be no new
> lega
where we dont have any
govermental force on us.
In the end only code matters.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5201-669912
Nine nineth on september the 9th Welcome to the new billenium
pgpSbPDLRrKPP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the GPL
whereas your contribution to a project is automatically set under the
GPL. Why not doing the same for the list archive. Its a contribution
to the Debian Project and IMHO we should treat it the same.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5201-669912
Why
On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 11:25:50AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:45:05PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > Read your quote: "License Must Not Contaminate Other Software"
>
> Excuse me, but what about that quote makes it illegal for a licen
own" can be very different as i think i have shown.
But if noone else is willing or able to see that i just shut up.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+49-subject-2-change
"Technology is a constant battle between manufacturers producing bigger and
more idiot-proof systems and nature producing bigger and better idiots."
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 07:00:23PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 06:21:48PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > But THIS relation (Linked Against) is not really clear from the Terms
> > in Par.9 - It says "distributed along" which KDE + QT2 would also
ke "distributed
under the terms of this license" which is definitly a restriction
to another program and though matches the contaminaton clause.
Am just saying: "Hey - i see space for misinterpretation" and from
my discussion on #debian.de nobody could clear this up and so i am
ask
Terms
in Par.9 - It says "distributed along" which KDE + QT2 would also
be.
IMHO the "distributed along" term does not clear the tightness/intense
of the coupling (As none of the Programs debian distributes is unrelated
to others - The relation COULD be the same medium)
Flo
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:57:03PM +0200, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > The paragraph says "License Must NOT Contaminate Other Software".
> > As Debian and the FSF agree that the GPL and QPL are incompatible
> > and this
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:41:59PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 05:18:14PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > the DFSG Paragraph 9 says:
> >
> > 9. License Must Not Contaminate Other Software
> > [...]
> > A restrictio
shows the "Contamination" of QT from GPL based programs.
Comments ?
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+49-subject-2-change
"Technology is a constant battle between manufacturers producing bigger and
more idiot-proof systems and nature producing bigger and better idiots."
19 matches
Mail list logo
