On 02/16/2014 09:21 PM, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> Sorry, could you try to explain more clearly what you want to say?
Here is a slide (number 16) from Piana being more clear them me :-)
| EUPL incompatible with GPL v.3
| * Why? Because of non reciprocity of compatibility?
| * No such a thing, str
On 02/16/2014 08:34 PM, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:07:55 +0100
> Erik Josefsson wrote:
>
>> On 02/16/2014 07:04 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>>> So it's hard to say that it's not DFSG-free.
>>
>> Is it?
>>
>> Piana wr
On 02/16/2014 07:04 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> So it's hard to say that it's not DFSG-free.
Is it?
Piana writes:
"Moreover, being a purportedly strong copyleft license, it would be
outright (and both ways) incompatible with the most widely used copyleft
license, the GNU GPL, and very likely incomp
Hi Sven.
On 02/16/2014 05:46 PM, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> The last post to discussions about the EUPL are now five years old.
> As I know (maybe I just didn't found it) there is no "final judgement" about
> the EUPL.
> I don't know who makes this final judgement (or more generally how it is
> mad
On 09/27/2013 11:33 PM, Paul Elliott wrote:
> I have some ideas in my head that I am thinking about patenting, but I only
> want to torture the proprietary software people with it.
You can be a pain to proprietary software people by time-stamping the
normal open development process:
http://e
On 07/14/2013 12:04 PM, Francesco Poli wrote:
>> > I have a package which is licensed under CC-BY 2.0
> Ouch! :-(
>
Estonia has been using e-elections software since 2005 and now it's
finally verifiable:
https://github.com/vvk-ehk/evalimine
But the licence is cc-by-nc-nd.
How can I convin
Hello,
The compilation of briefing notes for the 9 July workshop on Legal
aspects of free and open source software organised by Policy Department
C on request by theCommittee on Legal Affairs(JURI) is now available
online:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201307/2013070
7 matches
Mail list logo
