Hi,
Le 02/01/2021 à 11:30, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
I have noticed some packages using the newer machine-readable copyright
format, but not specifying any copyright for debian/*
FWIW, I do that in most of the (simple) packages I’m maintaining: I’m
fine using the same license as upstream, hen
Hi,
Le 13/11/2014 16:37, Ben Finney a écrit :
>> The file debian/copyright only contains the license of the sources;
>
> Not true.
That’s a strong affirmation. Policy 4.5 may deserve some clarification,
but I wouldn’t be so affirmative (or negative).
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Le 25/05/2014 16:01, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> I am surprised by the fact that you changed the text of the copyright
> statement as found in festvox/upc_ca_ona_hts.scm.
The policy (4.5) clearly states that’s not allowed: “Every package must
be a
Hi,
Le 12/03/2012 09:09, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> There are no terms of use that I have found available from the
> freetranslation site
As any other work, unless properly stated compatible with $license, you
can only only assume “Copyright $stuff, all right reserved”
Regards
David
s
Le 09/01/2012 17:39, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:17:02 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:40:35PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
>>> I think that this is exactly what people opposing to copyright
>>> assignment want to avoid: giving permission to re-lic
Le 04/12/2011 21:02, Clark C. Evans a écrit :
> I'd say that any dependency on non-free remote service fails Debian's
> Desert Island Test [1]
Nothing prevents people to distribute the code inside a desert Island.
The fact that the program would be useless if it depends on a remote
service is an
Hi Clark,
On 24/11/2011 14:08, Clark C. Evans wrote:
> I'm looking for a software license, which Debian would
> support, that actively encourages use of free platforms;
> and consequently restricts proprietary platforms.
If you're looking for a license that “discriminate against [a] group of
per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 19/01/2011 22:24, Simon Chopin a écrit :
> Hi !
Hi all, Kalle CCed,
> Out of curiosity, I looked at the GNU License list and found the Free
> Art/Art Libre license [1]. As it turns out, the FSF lawyers have already
> stated that this license, wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Thanks to Simon who asked me about the DFSG compliance of Kalle's design
license, and for pointing me to this thread.
Le 25/01/2009 07:55, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:41:18 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
May I dig up this al
9 matches
Mail list logo
