> with a package where upstream are untrustworthy lying bastards.
It's sad to see that discussion is returning to those levels, oh well..
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Hello,
Does mplayer has patent problems that stop it from going into debian?
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
She swore and she cursed, that she never would deceive me
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
es have been resolved, and the only left
issue is that someone mentioned 'possible patent problems', I've been asked
to get an 'OK' on patents from debian-legal before we can procede.
> one that's likely to expose you to greater liability.
That's what I thought.
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
> What are you trying to do with this mail? haven't you seen the replies
> from other developers pointing out my errors and misunderstandings?
I wrote it before I read them, sorry.
Anyhoo, I'm still trying to get a reply to my original mail.
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
She swore and
s is not a solution. You should contact and work with the
> author.
Author of patent?
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
She swore and she cursed, that she never would deceive me
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
ts do we ignore and which do we
respect?
Would uploading to non-us solve the problem? And if not, how would one go
about locating software patents in every country that uses such patents?
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
She swore and she cursed, that she never would deceive me
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939
Hello,
I was just about to send packages for uploading, when one more issue
about mplayer's sources creeped up, one file seems to bee a bit
controversial on licence side ( divx_vbr.c, included later in this
mail).
Since then, I've located way around it: "Michael Niedermayer
implemented a two
> *you do not have to ask or pay for permission*."
you don't understand the problem? when we could pay for linux it would
cost us less then not paying and paying government taxes for $0 bills.
This is not a legal problem to debian nor FSF, but it is a problem because
it'll scare people away from
> a licensed software for free that it means this software has a regular
> price normally. And then they treats this software as a donation.
that's not why they taxed it - under polish law when your receive sth
that you gain money with then you pay taxes for it.
maybe lawyer should comment on th
> > continue to feel that this is in error, please send us a
> > self-addressed stamped envelope and we will send you an
> > official bill for $0 (US).
>
> Official bill for $0 will be not accepted in Poland.
> It must be > 0.
Exactly THAT was the problem in beforementioned(duh? is there such
10 matches
Mail list logo
