deluge, python-libtorrent and OpenSSL

ndings for libtorrent-rasterbar, which in turn gets linked against OpenSSL. So, is it right to ask upstream to add the exception? Thanks, -- Cristian Greco GPG key ID: 0x0C095825 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#522311: qbittorrent: Linked with OpenSSL, seems to be a GPL violation

Hi. On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 10:45:02PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 22:25, Cristian Greco > wrote: > > This is not what I was looking for (and this solution wouldn't be useful, as > > all existing clients actually require encryption to be enable

Re: Bug#522311: qbittorrent: Linked with OpenSSL, seems to be a GPL violation

Hi. On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:06:49PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:43:53AM +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: > > 2) Why doesn't lintian complain about the exception if the source code > > contains > > GPL + another different license (this is

Re: Bug#522311: qbittorrent: Linked with OpenSSL, seems to be a GPL violation

On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 12:00:56PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 05:06, Cristian Greco > wrote: > > [ CCing debian-legal for comments ] > > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:37:49PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> The libcurl case might be

Re: Bug#522311: qbittorrent: Linked with OpenSSL, seems to be a GPL violation

[ CCing debian-legal for comments ] On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:37:49PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:35:30AM +0200, Cristian Greco wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:27:19PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > $ ldd /usr/bi

Re: bittorrent open source license version 1.1

3: http://www.mail-archive.com/deluge-com...@googlegroups.com/msg00713.html File metafile.py is a modified version of makemetafile.py from BitTorrent, but unfortunately it is released under BTOSL 1.1 also in the latest release. Thanks, -- Cristian Greco GPG key ID: 0x0C095825 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

bittorrent open source license version 1.1

scussion, which seems to mark the license as non-free: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/10/msg00042.html BTW, package qtorrent (orphaned) include a previous version of bencode.py released under the same license version 1.0. Any opinion? Thanks, -- Cristian Greco GPG key

Re: deluge and GeoIP database license

;ll repackage the source tarball. Any suggestion? Thanks, Cristian -- . ''`. Cristian Greco - [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : http://alioth.debian.org/~cristian-guest `. `'` GPG Public Key ID: 1024D/0C095825 `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: deluge and GeoIP database license

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:09:45PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Cristian Greco schrieb: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm working for a new upload of deluge[0] (bittorrent client). > > > > The source tarball includes a GeoLite Country (binary) database by > >

Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] deluge and GeoIP database license

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 01:42:36AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Hello, > > penktadienis 21 Lapkritis 2008, Cristian Greco rašė: > > I've found that ktorrent (CCing to pkg-kde-extras, please CC your > > replies because I'm not subscribed) uses the same DB by M

deluge and GeoIP database license

OODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS DATABASE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. --