Re: distributing precompiled binaries

2009-04-02 Thread Chow Loong Jin
n I have time, I'll work on packaging that, as it doesn't seem to be in Debian yet. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: distributing precompiled binaries

2009-03-29 Thread Chow Loong Jin
r all, it > requires a proprietary program to process it properly! :-) No, OO.o is free. > imho, the difference between plain text and a plain pdf is minimal. If, > however, the pdf has loads of embedded links etc ... -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: distributing precompiled binaries

2009-03-27 Thread Chow Loong Jin
be rebuilt from those sources alone? It probably can, with an appropriate compiler. However, I'm not sure there's such a compiler in Debian. > > If it's a bug which has been overlooked, that's something else to fix, > not a reason for remuco to introduce a similar bug. Or perhaps it was a non-issue to begin with. I'll contact Michal Čihař (gammu maintainer) and ask him about it. -- Chow Loong Jin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: distributing precompiled binaries

2009-03-27 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 11:24 +, MJ Ray wrote: > Chow Loong Jin wrote: [...] > > For the Python part, the sources are completely distributed, and no > > binaries are in the tarball. However, for the Java part, only the .jar > > is distributed in the tarball. I have c

distributing precompiled binaries

2009-03-26 Thread Chow Loong Jin
un.com/products/sjwtoolkit/ [2] https://cds.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/CDS-CDS_Developer-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewLicense-Start P.S. I sent this on debian-mentors already, then was told by bremner that I should send this here, so I'm sorry if you have received this twice. -- Chow Loong