s addendum should be fully ok for Debian.
Bernd Warken
__
Mit WEB.DE FreePhone mit hoechster Qualitaet ab 0 Ct./Min.
weltweit telefonieren! http://freephone.web.de/?mc=021201
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 02:03:38PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 07:24:54PM +0100, Bernd Warken wrote:
>
> > Exactly, so the documents go as 2) and are not ruled by DFSG.
>
> That's one possible interpretation. I advocate another. Do you agree
to trash the whole concept of freeness.
I'm speaking about big trouble!
Bernd Warken
free packages, and even request a million
dollars fee for it.
The DFSG in its actual interpretation is suicide. Debian must revise
it to survive and to stay free.
Bernd Warken
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:38:37PM +, M. Drew Streib wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:46:56PM +0100, Bernd Warken wrote:
> > A new kind of document license based on the GNU Free Documentation
> > License is needed. Who is interested?
>
> I think that a better id
ike the FDL, while the
content must have a license of its own.
4) There can be derivative work using the document, e.g. performances,
exhibitions. etc.
A new kind of document license based on the GNU Free Documentation
License is needed. Who is interested?
Short, constructive comments welcome.
Bernd Warken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:45:59PM +, Sunnanvind wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bernd Warken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > So there should be a note in the Debian wekkly news to make things
> > clear.
> > That's what most people
Please stop fighting each other. We all have the same aim, so let's
join, Debian, FSF, OpenSource. This list is not a place for personal
revenge.
To reduce traffic, please do not answer this mail.
Bernd Warken
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 06:54:12PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 11:59:47PM +0100, Bernd Warken wrote:
> > Some time ago, there was a discussion to make documents under the GNU
> > Free Documentation License (FDL) unfree for Debian.
>
> Some t
future documents, but leave the existing documents as free because they
are. In my case, this affects the man-pages of groff.
I hope that I could make this subtle difference clear.
Bernd Warken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10 matches
Mail list logo
