Re: Roundup license changes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > It looks quite harmless on first read, but it would be easier to be > sure if you could provide us with a link to the reasons why "the first > upload was rejected". The WNPP bug report

Roundup license changes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, after the first roundup[1] upload was rejected, Richard Jones (the upstream author) made the license a bit more clear. Here is the new scoop. If there aren't any more issues arising, I'll upload again (with the COPYING.txt replaced by that from cu

Re: Roundup copyright DFSG free (take 2)?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 07:48:28AM +1100, Richard Jones wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 02:06 am, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > > the author clarified his license with regard to the Python version. > > The version in question now is the PS

Roundup copyright DFSG free (take 2)?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the author clarified his license with regard to the Python version. The version in question now is the PSF 2.1 license[1], which is incompatible with GPL[2]. However, I think it's DFSG free and therefore can be packaged. Any objections? [1] http:

Re: Copyright(s) for roundup DFSG free?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:43:14AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:49:56AM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > > Copyright (c) 2001 Bizar Software Pty Ltd (http://www.bizarsoftware.com.au/) > > > >

Copyright(s) for roundup DFSG free?

Templates) I know ZPL is DFSG free, and 1) and 2) seem so, what do you think? Cheers, Bastian -- Bastian Kleineidam Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor Copyright (c) 2002 eKit.com Inc (http://www.ekit.com/) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person