pyright next to it,
> (i made that last example, to be sure i get it)
Not public domain. Copyrighted with a statement that could be interpreted as a
license. The author apparently meant to allow anyone to use the work as if it
were in the public domain.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
upstream for the pros/cons/consequences of such things?
The license allows Debian (or anyone) to remove the popup without additional
permission from upstream.
In this case I prefer to keep the popup if it is shown only once. I'm not
suggesting to make that a general rule in Debian.
Regar
or shall I still create a +dfsg tarball by removing the file in question and
> then re-add the newly licensed file with a patch?
Not needed, in my opinion.
> I just don't want to wait until upstream releases a new version with possibly
> changing the copyright info in this file.
N
gt; License Header is always there... it seems to be a standard header from
> the EPS module (export filter).
License header or copyright header ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:03:43PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 05:20:29PM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:40:00AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:24:25AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:40:00AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:24:25AM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > Every copyright notice means that there is at least a part copyrighted by
> > the
> > mentioned copyright holder.
>
> Every?
Yes.
> Li
this issue is important enough to
> you that you want to track down the EULA and verify that the embedded code
> isn't freely distributable/modifiable, that's your prerogative;
If the EULA would make the software free to redistribute then the EULA must be
included in debian/copyri
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 01:29:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 07:51:55PM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > A copyright statement does not, by itself, say anything about the license
> > > of
> > > the work. Since Illustrator is frequently u
quot;contains postscript library code that is copyrighted by Adobe")
without license from Adobe, then the files cannot be freely redistributed.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731195155.gd1...@master.debian.org
e files by running them through eps2eps does not make the
result free.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731193111.gc1...@master.debian.org
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:59 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Steve Langasek:
>
> >> Sorry, I fail to see how you can do this without losing your
> >> credibility. The MIT license specifically gives one permission "to
> >> deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
> >>
logo,
>
> > Huh? It's about to be relicensed under the MIT license.
>
> And enforced as a trademark, which he's currently misusing?
I agree with Steve that the "Debian Official Use Logo" is used in a way
that is not allowed by the license published at
http://www.de
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 22:27 +0300, Vsevolod Krishchenko wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I fear that it is sound stupid
Not to me. :)
> but I wonder does such thing like Debian
> EULA exit? FC, for example, has EULA
> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/EULA)
I have not yet seen such E
subject still the same or does my message start a
new discussion? Does it work towards a real solution for the issue being
discussed? Have I read all previous messages of the subject so that my
message doesn't repeat what's already said? And so on.
Thanks,
Bart Martens
--
Macromedia for an exceptional permission. Does
anyone know how such a permission should be asked? (Maybe an e-mail
template...)
Bart Martens
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/99134
[2] http://www.macromedia.com/support/shockwave/info/licensing/license.html
15 matches
Mail list logo
