On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 03:18:36PM -0500, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> Over the years, the open source community, including Debian, has had a few
> lengthy discussions and disagreements regarding the PHP license.[^1][^2][^3]
> The TL;DR sentiment of all these discussions amounts to: change t
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 05:22:17PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On 6/11/23 16:37, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:19:48PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I was stumbled on Söhne font collection, primarily due to ChatGP
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:19:48PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was stumbled on Söhne font collection, primarily due to ChatGPT
> uses it for its web interface. I'd like to also use it for hypothetical
> web app (let's name it foodb) to be packaged in Debian (due to design
> constraints
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Borja Sanchez wrote:
> Dear Debian Project Team,
>
> My name is Borja Sanchez, writting from Spain. I am currently planning to
> run a paid course where I will distribute a modified version of Debian,
> rebranded and renamed. This software will be offered
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 01:38:28PM +0100, Adam Ant wrote:
>
[Stripping HTML formatting where I see it - could you please use plain text]
>
> Large portions of the core code base are labeled as LGPL-2 - There is no such
> > licence. It is either GPL-2 or LGPL-2.1
>
> A bit of history:
>
> Linux
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 06:58:19AM +0100, Jan Gru wrote:
> Dear Andy,
> dear list members,
>
> thank you very much for your reply and your thoughts on this issue.
> I want to pose two concrete follow/up questions if you allow.
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 13:00:08 +0000, An
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 07:33:45AM +0100, Jan Gru wrote:
> Dear debian-legal-members,
>
> I am wondering, whether you consider 'The Unlicense' [0] to be
> DFSG-compliant? On the OSI-mailing list [1] has been a discussion
> arguing, that this license model is
>
> a) not global
> b) inconsistent an
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 12:42:52AM -0500, Scarlett Kelley wrote:
> My email account sk21rene...@gmail.com and scarlettdickinso...@gmail.com
> were hacked and they stole all of my crypto and used github and created an
> app called crypto kitties and the character octocat on GitHub I do not know
> ho
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:45:14PM -0300, Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> Hi, folks.
>
> I'm the new maintainer of devtodo and would appreciate an assistance of the
> debian-legal on the license matter. As noted, devtodo is licensed under
> GPL-2 only, althou
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 06:07:52PM -0400, James Cloos wrote:
> > "WL" == Walter Landry writes:
>
> WL> I found something here
>
> WL> ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
>
> WL> I do not think it applies in this case.
>
> WL> Cheers,
> WL> Walter Landry
>
> Tha
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 07:19:18PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> That means that it is for the FTP team to set that policy.
>
> AFAIAA this is the best description of the FTP team policy:
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html
>
> > My impression is that the type of issue currently un
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 03:31:00PM +0200, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I packaged rtl-sdr [1] a while ago but I'm having a serious legal
> issue. Some files related to DVB-T tuners don't have any headers and
> upstream [2] didn't answer my call for help...
>
> "tuner_fc2580.{c,h}"
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 10:39:53PM +, Etenil wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I contact you regarding a possible breach of the terms of at least the
> GPL license on the Etch-based distribution Elive.
>
> http://www.elivecd.org/Help/License
>
> As you can see in the above link, the distribution is l
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:48:43PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Laszlo Lebrun wrote:
> > Do you know about any jurisprudence about that question?
>
According to David A. Wheeler, the US Department of Defense has
recognised FLOSS (Free/Libre/Open Source Software) as being on the
same basis as Commerci
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:24:26PM +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The vdrift upstream uploaded a data tarball with some content licensed under
> the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.5 license.
>
> After discution there are agree to relicense these files under
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 08:09:18PM -0500, Tom Marble wrote:
> All:
>
> Let me start by repeating the message that Simon and I gave
> to you at Debconf: there is every reason for us to be friends
> and working with you is very important for Sun.
>
Thank you very much indeed for all your hard work
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:41:26AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:53:56 +1100 Andrew Donnellan wrote:
>
> > I think that KPovModeler was developed with the intention that you
> > have POV-Ray installed. It will work fine without it, but it can only
> > save KPMs and POV file
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 02:05:40PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Drew Scott Daniels:
>
> > I think the first objection that I have is that there doesn't seem to be
> > source code to the Sun Studio 10 compiler (I may be wrong though)
>
> I would be really surprised if Sun released their compil
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 01:38:24PM -0400, astronut wrote:
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> Jeff King wrote:
>
> >The latter message is from me. I am looking for such a license, as I am
> >trying to avoid ridiculous license propagation. My ideal license
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:38:20PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
in response to Don Armstrong
>
> I'm very sorry, the top posting was not intentional. I will also try not
> to Cc: to people who don't want an extra copy.
>
> > On Fri, 13 May 2005, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > I just wanted to know i
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anybody got a good advice for how to dual license some of the software
> I've developed. I would like to use GPL for non-commercial use (e.g.
> private persons and universities) and a commercial license for
> companies.
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
