On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 13:10, Paul Jakma wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Andrej Shadura wrote:
>
> > Apparently they’re not qualified in software licenses and copyrights.
> > Sorry I have to say that.
>
> You're a software engineer, with no legal qualification
Hi Paul,
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 at 14:19, Paul Jakma wrote:
> It is - I am advised - not permitted by the GPL and infringing of my
> copyright in thise code-base, and also incitement to commit copyright
> infringement. As such, the termination clause of the GPL became
> applicable to FRR.
>
> Use an
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 01:34, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
>
> Hi, I've just published a new version of the Hacking License that
> receipts some of the objections proposed on debian-legal and on
> copyleft-next.
>
> In particular, I have
> 1) removed requirement to change the logo (see [1] from Francesco P
On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 03:51, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 08:50:56PM +0200, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> >
> >I was going to have a look but got distracted by writing kernel drivers
> >â** fascinating stuff :D
> >I will try and spe
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, 20:15 Nicholas D Steeves, wrote:
> Update
>
> Sorry for my deplorable memory and lack of organisation wrt this bug;
> I committed some initial work and then forgot about it. Given my work
> schedule for Oct and Nov it is unlikely that I will be able to prevent
> the sch
On 20 August 2018 at 08:24, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> On 20 August 2018 at 03:24, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> Lumin dijo [Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 01:07:54PM +]:
>>> Hi debian-legal,
>>>
>>> The license for the last libtensorflow.so dependency is very confusing
>&
On 20 August 2018 at 03:24, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Lumin dijo [Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 01:07:54PM +]:
>> Hi debian-legal,
>>
>> The license for the last libtensorflow.so dependency is very confusing
>> because it looks quite incomplete, or exetremely overly simplified.
>>
>> > https://github.com/te
7 matches
Mail list logo
