Andrew Suffield wrote:
> with a package where upstream are untrustworthy lying bastards.
I have followed the history of mplayer vs Debian, and I
saw many flames, but yet this line by Andrew Suffield is
an all-time record
why isnt it possible to have a civil discussion on this matter?
this is soo
hi
I have uploaded mplayer 1.0pre6a-3
It ships a correctly repackaged upstream source;
it has a 'debian/rules get-orig-source' (as asked in debian-devel)
that creates the .orig.tar.gz
It should appear in http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW.html
and in I will put a copy in
http://tonelli.sns
Adam Warner wrote:
I'm please to see what has been done Andrea. I believe the copyright
file can be improved by these completely unofficial suggestions
(suggestions start with *):
This package was first debianized by * TeLeNiEkO * [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 12:24:04 +0100.
Or
> subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sorry: yesterday evening I commented out the lines
#on wakeup:
# boot brain/0
I am now self-patching with the help of a java-cup
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
"E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Tonino Carotone)
4.
So if people on debian-legal thinks that it is important, I will add
a diff of libmpeg2.
---
have fun
a.
--
Andrea Mennucc
"E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Tonino Carotone)
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
>
> > what about uploading that package to the debian archives, in
> > non-free?
>
> Do the license of Compaq and the Debian policy allow this? Presumably a
> debian-maintainer with access-p
8 matches
Mail list logo
