Re: License review: tarsnap

2025-02-05 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 3:58:00 PM MST Simon Josefsson wrote: > All, > > Is the license below acceptable for inclusion into 'non-free'? It is > claimed to cover the tarsnap software, see > https://github.com/Tarsnap/tarsnap and https://www.tarsnap.com/ for > background. > > Regarding RFP/IT

Re: Bug#799214: License review: tarsnap

2025-02-05 Thread Graham Percival
On 2025-02-05, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 06:06, Michael Lustfield wrote: > > > > They actually included > > their own debian/ directory, making it a clear license violation to > > touch anything inside. > > Hence Michael is right. Because even the smallest and most innoc

Bug#799214: Info received (License review: tarsnap)

2025-02-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will rep

Re: License review: tarsnap

2025-02-05 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 06:41:47PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote: > > "Simon" == Simon Josefsson writes: > > Simon> All, Is the license below acceptable for inclusion into > Simon> 'non-free'? It is claimed to cover the tarsnap software, see > Simon> https://github.com/Tarsnap/tarsnap

Re: License review: tarsnap

2025-02-05 Thread Simon Josefsson
Michael Lustfield writes: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 5:29 PM Simon Josefsson wrote: >> "Andrew M.A. Cater" writes: >> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 11:58:00PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> > Packaging the software for Debian amounts to modification: minimal >> > modification but modification anywa