On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:06:15 +0200 Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 07:40:09AM +0200, Michael Stehmann wrote:
> > Please do not develop new Free Software lincences.
> >
> > We still have more than 140.
> >
> > We need perhaps 3 to 5.
> >
> > Compliance checks are difficult enough now
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 07:40:09AM +0200, Michael Stehmann wrote:
> Please do not develop new Free Software lincences.
>
> We still have more than 140.
>
> We need perhaps 3 to 5.
>
> Compliance checks are difficult enough now!
>
> So please do not develop new Free Software lincences!
This. Ab
Hello,
I have reservation about clauses 10 and 14.
Clause 10 seems to restrict the use of software, even the clause is
well-intentioned.
There are many well-intentioned ideas to restrict one or more of the
four freedoms, but they are patronizing. The person who distributes
software under a
Hi,
IMO, non-free:
- fail with desert island/dissident tests
- non-commercial constraints
My 2 cents
On 10/11/24 11:33, PEPPÈ Santarsiero wrote:
This version include correction reported by Soren Stoutner from the
debian team.
Thanks for considering my request.
---
This version include correction reported by Soren Stoutner from the debian team.
Thanks for considering my request.
Da: Soren Stoutner
Inviato: Venerdì, 11 Ottobre, 2024 00:21
A: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Cc: PEPPÈ Santarsiero
Oggetto: Re: Request for Evaluati
5 matches
Mail list logo
