Hi,
since this issue becomes complex I'd like to bring up it at debian-legal
list for advise.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 08:08:26AM +0200, Ole Tange wrote:
> Ian Turner wrote:
> > On 8/28/21 7:41 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >>I updated the patch in Git[1] but did not yet
J.B. Nicholson writes:
> Jeffrey H. Johnson wrote:
>> Redistribution and use in ‘source’ [...] and ‘compiled’ forms [...] in whole
>> or in
>> part, for any purpose, including commercial applications, with or without
>> modification, in any medium, is hereby permitted, without fee or royalty,
>>
On 2021-08-29 11:03 PM, Walter Landry wrote:
The license looks to me like it is saying that anyone distributing the
work does not have to pay a fee to the original author. It does not
prohibit the distributor from imposing fees on end recipients.
Otherwise, the blurb about 'commercial applicatio
Jeffrey H. Johnson wrote:
I'm contacting the list to inquire regarding the acceptability
of the following proposed documentation license, as I'd like to
ensure that it will become be an impediment to having
documentation licensed under it added to Debian in the future.
The DPS8M license version
Greetings,
I'm contacting the list to inquire regarding the acceptability
of the following proposed documentation license, as I'd like to
ensure that it will become be an impediment to having
documentation licensed under it added to Debian in the future.
---
THE DPS8M DOCUMENTATION LICENSE
Vers
5 matches
Mail list logo
