Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 03:36:04PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:33:32 -0400 Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >... > Well, as far as I can say, the 4-clause BSD license is considered > acceptable for Debian main. > It is also [considered] a free software license by the FSF, althoug

Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-11 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:33:32 -0400 Nicholas D Steeves wrote: [...] > Adrian Bunk writes: > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > >>... > >> * Neither name of the company nor the names of its contributors may be > >> used to endorse or promote products derived

Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-11 Thread Florian Weimer
* Nicholas D. Steeves: > Hi, > > Adrian Bunk writes: > >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:48:31PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> >>> it would still not be DFSG-free, because it >>> fails the "desert island test" for snail mail. Were OmniTI Computer >>> Consulting would accept email, it would als

Re: Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-11 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Hi, Il 11/07/20 00:33, Nicholas D Steeves ha scritto: > It fails the "desert island test" because > > 1. Any mention of the features or use of this software requires > user-facing display of the text "This product includes software > developed by OmniTI Computer Consulting". > > 2. OmniTI Comp