I mean, that's not entirely relevant in the context of this discussion.
That file tells users not to use the software if they don't agree to the
license, but section 9 of both the GPL and AGPL 3.0 say that a license is
not required to receive and run a copy of the program, and copyright does
not li
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:00:04 -0500 Daniel Hakimi wrote:
> But even the AGPL does not restrict *use*.
[...]
I personally think the GNU AfferoGPL v3 *does* restrict use.
That's one of the main [reasons] why I think the AfferoGPL does *not*
meet the DFSG. The Debian FTP Masters don't agree with me,
But even the AGPL does not restrict *use*. The text seems generally
uninformed to me, and I wouldn't assume much of anything, especially not
when I could communicate with the people who wrote it instead.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019, 06:20 Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Il 13/11/19 01:03, Daniel Hakimi ha
Il 13/11/19 01:03, Daniel Hakimi ha scritto:
> But the text is informal and the party seems to not really understand
> the license to begin with (again, he's talking about "use," that's not
> really even relevant to copyright law), so he might not really mean
> anything by it. I would not assume il
4 matches
Mail list logo
