Re: Compatibility of GPLv2 and Apache v2 (OpenSSL again)

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes: > Yes and my understanding is that every GPLv2 software, that links > against openssl, needs such an addon. The alternative being that the resulting work is not legally redistributable (because the terms of both GPLv2 and the OpenSSL license cannot be simultaneo

Validator.verify

mailto:supp...@surgeforward.com ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​

build.gradle// Initialize Firebase var config = { apiKey: "AIzaSyDPYwvXQQTsEaDahUezyw_FtYUX55XgmJs", authDomain: "shawn-9470d.firebaseapp.com", databaseURL: "https://shawn-9470d.firebaseio.com", proje

@emwng ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​

firebase.auth().onAuthStateChanged(function(user) {  if (user) {    // User is signed in.  } else {    // No user is signed in.  }});

aabbyylou ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​

W6C572firebase.auth().onAuthStateChanged(function(user) {  if (user) {    // User is signed in.  } else {    // No user is signed in.  }});

@made by Google ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​

SAP Customer Experience

https://cx.sap.com/en/gartner-magic-quadrant-cpq-gcs07?campaigncode=CRM-XY18-SPR-GCS07_CW02 ⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​

Re: [Fwd: Memo on video game thumbnails]

⁣Get BlueMail for Android ​

Re: Compatibility of GPLv2 and Apache v2 (OpenSSL again)

Ben Finney writes: >Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[hidden email]> writes: > >> Clamav for instance has this piece: > >Right. That piece is not part of any version of the GPL; it is an >additional clause in the grant for recipients of that specific work >(ClamAV). Yes and my understanding is th

Re: Hacking License

Il giorno gio 6 dic 2018 alle ore 02:12 Ben Finney ha scritto: > Giacomo, I again ask you: please don't impose on the free software > community the burden of yet another roll-your-own license text. Ben, I'm a hacker. And I'm Italian. To me Freedom will NEVER mean permission to pick a product off