Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org

2016-01-29 Thread Andrew Shadura
On 29 January 2016 at 11:04, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: > I mean the original ancient vim license of the times before GPLv2+. But as you see they moved on from that. And for good reasons. -- Cheers, Andrew

Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org

2016-01-29 Thread Elmar Stellnberger
I mean the original ancient vim license of the times before GPLv2+. Am 2016-01-29 um 11:03 schrieb Anthony DeRobertis: On 01/21/2016 05:09 PM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: There are licenses like the vim license which force developers to ship their patches proactively to the upstream developers an

Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org

2016-01-29 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On 01/21/2016 05:09 PM, Elmar Stellnberger wrote: There are licenses like the vim license which force developers to ship their patches proactively to the upstream developers and thus possibly to the public. If the vim license does not discriminate against a certain field of endeavour this licen