Daniel Stender writes:
> I've asked about its copyright on Mentors before and the consensus was
> that by the trademark policy [2] it's considered to be freely
> distributable, but *might* violate the DFSG.
>
> I'm seeking now for an "official" statement before this is going to be
> put in the ne
Hello,
I'm working on a package which sources includes a version of the
official Python logo [1], which is used for examples and the tests.
I've asked about its copyright on Mentors before and the
consensus was that by the trademark policy [2] it's considered
to be freely distributable, but *migh
2 matches
Mail list logo
