Re: Question about a "custom" license from dictconfig

>> Also, how does not allowing the usage of a name in advertising make it >> non-DFSG free? > > Discrimination against named persons fails DFSG 5 for sure, doesn't it? > > It might also fail 1 or 3 because it seems like the reverse of licences > that REQUIRE authors to disclose their names, which

Debian and the Vinay Sajip License

Hi Vinay Sajip, I'm from Debian GNU/Linux. On our legal mailing list, we've been having concerns about the license that you put most of your software under. Essentially, we think that when you say the name of Vinay Sajip not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the so

Re: Upstream GPL-3+ vs debian/* GPL-2+

Thanks all for explanations. This question is clear to me now. Regards, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAP+dXJe=hwzz5xsvavfrqhbqwq2dblfeg

Re: Question about a "custom" license from dictconfig

Riley Baird wrote: > My intuition would tell me that other people named Vinay Sajip would not > be able to use their name in advertising or publicity pertaining to the > software. However, this same logic would also apply to everything > written under 3-clause BSD, the only difference being that th