Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

On 4 August 2014 13:26:11 GMT+01:00, Ian Jackson wrote: >(-project dropped from the CC) > >MJ Ray writes ("Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license"): >> Secondly, unless it says otherwise, a naming restriction in a >> copyright licence doesn't permit honest source attribution and all >> the other

Re: Standardization documents in xsd and wsdl format

On 11 July 2014 16:20:45 CEST, Mattias Ellert wrote: >Standardization bodies tend to want to not have random >people making random changes to their standardization documents that >would create incompatible versions of the standards. The documentation >licenses used by these organization therefore

Re: Translated License

Ian Jackson writes: >We make our own decisions. Thats why I love it. :) Georg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/8761i8jrha@ejus.ejus

Re: Translated License

Georg Pfeiffer writes ("Re: Translated License"): > Ian Jackson writes: > > There is nothing wrong with a copyright licence in German. > > Thank you very much for this clear position, wich seemed to be mine only > for discouraging long times :D > > My german combattants bothered, our german lice

Re: Translated License

Ian Jackson writes: > There is nothing wrong with a copyright licence in German. Thank you very much for this clear position, wich seemed to be mine only for discouraging long times :D My german combattants bothered, our german license would be estimated non-free because it is not OSI certified

Re: PHP licence SFLC questions draft v3

Ian Jackson writes ("PHP licence SFLC questions draft v3"): > Some members of the Debian project have some concerns about the PHP > licence. These worries are dismissed by other members and by relevant > upstreams. We would like some advice. > > We are concerned here with the PHP 3.01 Licences,

PHP licence SFLC questions draft v3

Draft question for SFLC: Some members of the Debian project have some concerns about the PHP licence. These worries are dismissed by other members and by relevant upstreams. We would like some advice. We are concerned here with the PHP 3.01 Licences, which can be found here: http://php.net/lic

Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

(-project dropped from the CC) MJ Ray writes ("Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license"): > Secondly, unless it says otherwise, a naming restriction in a > copyright licence doesn't permit honest source attribution and all > the other nominative and fair uses that a trademark would. This is > more

Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

Francesco Poli writes ("Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license"): > On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:59:11 +0100 Ian Jackson wrote: > > Paragraph 6 of the main licence text requires this notice: > > > >"This product includes PHP software, freely available from > > ". >

Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

Charles Plessy writes ("Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license"): > I think that it is important that a few of the ‘some members’ would > identify themselves in support for that request, and explain what > they would do if the worries expressed below turned out to be true. At the moment people ar

Re: Translated License

Georg Pfeiffer writes ("Translated License"): > We intend to give the whole project a default license wich is a german > translation of the MIT license [2]. The english text is included. Our > intention is, that the german text shall be more clear and more > convenient to german project members (au

Re: Zend Engine License

Riley Baird writes ("Re: Zend Engine License"): > On 02/08/14 16:30, MJ Ray wrote: > > I notice that Zend framework seems to be under a BSD style licence, without > > that sort of clause. > > > It is in the php5 package. Here is the d/copyright file: > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/change

Re: Legality of analysing DSDT table

Mateusz Jończyk writes ("Legality of analysing DSDT table"): > I am working on some bug in Linux kernel that is probably somehow > related to ACPI. Would it be legal if a bug reporter in India sent > me his DSDT table and I would then decompile and analyse it? You seem to be in Poland. I think t