Re: [Tts-project] Is it allowed to change license statement? [Was: Requesting sponsorship for Catalan Festival support]

On 25-05-14 23:27, David Prévot wrote: >> I am surprised by the fact that you changed the text of the copyright >> statement as found in festvox/upc_ca_ona_hts.scm. > > The policy (4.5) clearly states that’s not allowed: “Every package must > be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright info

Re: Is it allowed to change license statement? [Was: Requesting sponsorship for Catalan Festival support]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 25/05/2014 16:01, Paul Gevers a écrit : > I am surprised by the fact that you changed the text of the copyright > statement as found in festvox/upc_ca_ona_hts.scm. The policy (4.5) clearly states that’s not allowed: “Every package must be a

Is it allowed to change license statement? [Was: Requesting sponsorship for Catalan Festival support]

Hi Sergio, debian-legal Sergio, sorry to annoy you (one last time I hope) with this license. On 21-05-14 00:54, Sergio Oller wrote: > I have standarized to "Festvox". Given that the changes were > formatting and a spelling mistake I have used the same text for both. I am surprised by the fact th

Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by SFLC and FSF

* Turkey Breast: > The basic issue is that this project uses an AGPL license with > several additions, which we were given to me by the SFLC and vetted > by the FSF. They fix an issue with the AGPL which is unique to > Bitcoin (ability to distribute the source code when using a > service), add a l