Steve Langasek wrote:
Let's not forget that Al Capone was convicted not for murder, racketeering,
or bootlegging, but for tax evasion; and that the US tax code specifies
where on your tax form you are required to report income from the sale of
illegal drugs. It would be ironic for a dissident to
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 04:27:14PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> >That's not the point. The purpose of the Dissident Test is to demonstrate
> >that distribution channels for software are not necessarily symmetric; it
> >may be very easy for you to distribute the software, but very
> >hard/expensive/d
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:53:01PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
Sure, but that doesn't make it DFSG free (hint: it's likely not)[1][2]
[1]: The Dissident test
[2]: The Desert Island test
Sure, but #2 is stupid. We didn't say "must send changes back
immediately." Nor would
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:53:01PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> >Sure, but that doesn't make it DFSG free (hint: it's likely not)[1][2]
> >[1]: The Dissident test
> >[2]: The Desert Island test
> Sure, but #2 is stupid. We didn't say "must send changes back
> immediately." Nor would we wish any suc
Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:19:47PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
Right, I want to understand AGPL's motivations is all.
I used to put similar terms on my code, back before the GPL existed.
Essentially: If you modify this code, you must send your
modifications back to me (the
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 10:45:00 -0700:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:27:31AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 06:55:12 -0700:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I'm no
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:19:47PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> >Right, I want to understand AGPL's motivations is all.
>
> I used to put similar terms on my code, back before the GPL existed.
> Essentially: If you modify this code, you must send your
> modifications back to me (the original author)
Hi,
I plan to package adms on the behalf of debian science in order to package qucs.
I have a legal problem:
Some file are :
Copyright 2007Accellera Organization, Inc.
Standard definitions
This file contains the standard definition package constants.vams
for Verilog-AMS HDL.
Extracted fr
Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 10:45:00 -0700:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:27:31AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 06:55:12 -0700:
> > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > > > > I'm no exp
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:27:31AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 06:55:12 -0700:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > > > I'm no expert but that would be my interpretation. Also when I asked
> > > > about the b
Excerpts from Richard Fontana's message of 2013-07-11 06:55:12 -0700:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > > I'm no expert but that would be my interpretation. Also when I asked
> > > about the basis of the network part of the AGPL during the GPLv3 talk
> > > at D
On 11/07/13 14:55, Richard Fontana wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> And with open source software you often deal with "modified" versions,
>> so claiming this is a special case ("[...] was specifically based on
>> modification, _not_ on public performanc
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> My understanding though that if Debian is the one making the
> modification then Debian is the one responsible for making the source
> available.
I think this is done already, since roughly 20 years, have a look at
ftp.debian.org
c
On 11.07.2013 09:12, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 07/11/2013 14:15, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
No I did not miss that, but I'm not entirely sure of the
implications. So if I
use a packaged version of a program which has been modified (e.g.
by Debian
pat
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:12:39PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> > I'm no expert but that would be my interpretation. Also when I asked
> > about the basis of the network part of the AGPL during the GPLv3 talk
> > at DebConf10 in NYC, Bradley said the AGPL was specifically based on
> > modificat
On 07/11/2013 14:15, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
>> No I did not miss that, but I'm not entirely sure of the implications. So if
>> I
>> use a packaged version of a program which has been modified (e.g. by Debian
>> patches) I am not obliged to make the s
16 matches
Mail list logo
