On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:13:25PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 13:01, Ondrej Sury wrote:
> > OK, it's very much annoying (since the tarball is huge and the updated
> > module won't hit PHP 5.5), but I will comply.
>
> This seems like a paper exercise which I doubt is worth
On Mon, May 13, 2013 15:31, Walter Landry wrote:
> "Thijs Kinkhorst" wrote:
>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 13:01, Ondrej Sury wrote:
>>> OK, it's very much annoying (since the tarball is huge and the updated
>>> module won't hit PHP 5.5), but I will comply.
>>
>> This seems like a paper exercise which I
"Thijs Kinkhorst" wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 13:01, Ondrej Sury wrote:
>> OK, it's very much annoying (since the tarball is huge and the updated
>> module won't hit PHP 5.5), but I will comply.
>
> This seems like a paper exercise which I doubt is worth our efforts.
>
> I seems extremely unli
On Mon, May 13, 2013 13:01, Ondrej Sury wrote:
> OK, it's very much annoying (since the tarball is huge and the updated
> module won't hit PHP 5.5), but I will comply.
This seems like a paper exercise which I doubt is worth our efforts.
I seems extremely unlikely that the author of the software c
OK, it's very much annoying (since the tarball is huge and the updated
module won't hit PHP 5.5), but I will comply.
O.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
>> But my point is that it's not illegal to distribute those source f
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> But my point is that it's not illegal to distribute those source files
> per se, it's just not permitted to use the "software" for Evil.
Right. The non-free part of the archive is for such software. Debian
main consists only of free software (
But my point is that it's not illegal to distribute those source files
per se, it's just not permitted to use the "software" for Evil.
And since we will not be using those source files, it seems to be ok
to distribute them as part of upstream tarball. But IANAL...
Ondrej
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Would it be OK to distribute those source files ("no-evil") and not
> use them to compile the extension?
Source packages are part of main too and thus should not contain non-free stuff.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To U
Hey,
just to clarify.
Would it be OK to distribute those source files ("no-evil") and not
use them to compile the extension?
Remi from Fedora has prepared patch on top of json-c, which will
replace this extension, so I will patch those files away. I just want
to avoid the dfsg-repacking if possi
9 matches
Mail list logo
