On Sunday, December 04, 2011 9:29 PM, "David Prévot"
wrote:
> are we going to pretend that apt is non-free because we can't
> use it on a desert Island, since there is no ftp.desertisland.debian.org
> official mirror available?
There's a big difference between requiring a service
that has a free
Le 04/12/2011 21:02, Clark C. Evans a écrit :
> I'd say that any dependency on non-free remote service fails Debian's
> Desert Island Test [1]
Nothing prevents people to distribute the code inside a desert Island.
The fact that the program would be useless if it depends on a remote
service is an
On Sunday, December 04, 2011 3:55ser PM, "Joey Hess"
wrote:
> > Perhaps they should be moved to 'contrib' category, because they
> > interface non-free web-services. Debian's 'main' repository seems not
> > the right place for any such web APIs.
>
...
> > How far down this line until it belongs in
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:18:22 +0200
Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
> > 2) For the audio to work a binary firmware is needed; it can be taken
> > from the Micosoft Kinect for Windows SDK[4] but since that is not
> > re-distributable I decided to use a script[5] which downloads and
> >
- Original message -
From: "Clark C. Evans"
To: license-disc...@opensource.org
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:38:20 -0500
Subject: a Free Island Public License?
Please find for your amusement and hopeful commentary
a different take on what it means to be Free Software.
FREE ISLAND PUBLIC LIC
Alexey Eromenko wrote:
> Hello Debian People !
>
> Debian 6.0 (Squeeze) ships packages [2] that integrate with web services
> (called in modern term 'Cloud Computing' or SaaS,
> 'Software-as-a-Service' if you will), such as the Facebook API.
> What if Facebook decides to close down it's APIs tomor
6 matches
Mail list logo
