Re: Plugins for non-free software in orig.tar.gz

2010-07-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 01 juillet 2010 à 00:40 +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo a écrit : > > Of course, the quickest and easiest solution, until the licensing is > > clarified, is dropping the scripts from the package... > > First of all, I need to talk to the author personally when he's available, > but

Re: Plugins for non-free software in orig.tar.gz

2010-07-02 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 00:40:13 +0200 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > On Wednesday 30 June 2010 23:27:41 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > > > I think the key questions here are: > > > > 0) does the plugin itself comply with the DFSG? > > > > > > It doesn't have any copyright line, other than:

Re: Providing an openssl-linked pycurl

2010-07-02 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:09:19 +0100, MJ Ray написа: > Yavor Doganov wrote: >> I see no difference between this scenario and a classic C program that >> supports both OpenSSL and GnuTLS via #ifdef's and `configure' options. > > In the C-ifdef scenario, the GPL program is derived from both OpenSSL > a