Simon McVittie wrote:
> Not that I know of; judging by putting this wording into Google, only Joey
> uses it. I called it "the ikiwiki basewiki license" above, but I don't think
> that's necessarily a good way to refer to it out of context. The rest of
> ikiwiki is not under this license (it's most
(Summary of the thread for Joey's benefit: some software mentioned on
debian-legal had a one-line license which was intended to be
almost-public-domain, but failed to give explicit permission to copy and
modify. Franck is talking to that software's author to get it relicensed in
a DFSG way; I sugge
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>> Is this intentional?
>
> No. Because the grant of licence DOES allow regrading, therefore what
> any particular version of the GPL says is irrelevant. The recipient CAN
> change the licence from GPL3 to GPL2 (or vice versa) because the *grant*
3 matches
Mail list logo
