Nicolas Spalinger wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> There are obviously varying needs and preferences (prejudices?) along
> the licensing spectrum but IMHO your reply is very reductive.
>
> At the end of the day upstreams make up their own mind about how they
> license their own creation but allow me to e
[...]
>> But then I found this page
>>
>> http://www.advogato.org/person/raph/diary/257.html
>>
>> which says
>>
>> By the way, URW did not donate these fonts under the GPL out of
>> their own hearts. Artifex paid good money for them, and donated them
>> out of a mix of self-interest and a
Walter Landry wrote:
> Nicolas Spalinger wrote:
>> Paul Wise wrote:
>>> I'd strongly suggest to indicate a preference about which license you
>>> would like them to choose.
>>>
>>> I would personally suggest standard FLOSS licenses like BSD,
>>> MIT/Expat, ISC, GPL + font exception etc. If those a
3 matches
Mail list logo
