Re: License of CORBA Interface Definition Files published by the Object Management Group

I wrote: > I'm attaching the unified diff from the CORBA 3.1 associated files to > the files contained orbit2. This diff is very small, suggesting that > either the files in orbit2 are modified copies of the CORBA 3.1 > associated files, or that the orbit2 files were derived (i.e. are a > derived

License of CORBA Interface Definition Files published by the Object Management Group

The source package orbit2_2.14.17.orig.tar.gz shipped by Debian contains the following files that concern me: src/idl/CORBA_PIDL/CORBA_Request.idl src/idl/CORBA_PIDL/pseudo_orb.idl src/idl/CORBA_PIDL/CORBA_ORB_init.idl src/idl/CORBA_PIDL/CORBA_ORB.idl src/idl/CORBA_PIDL/CORBA_Interceptor.idl src/i

Re: LGPL code that includes files licensed under Sun Public License 1.0 - DFSG-free?

tony mancill writes: > I'm not saying that they are unchanged in the source distribution of libjxp, > but that the upstream author says that the files that were released as part > of JavaCC under the SPL license are the same files (meaning they have the > same content) as the files now under the

Re: issues with the AGPL

On Sunday 23 August 2009 6:57:50 am Greg Harris wrote: > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:17:49 -0700 > Chris Harshman wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 12:43 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 02:31:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > > > > All that is for USA, right? Do