"Anthony W. Youngman" writes:
> Basically he should put there "(c) Hubert" and "licence GPLv3+".
Small nit (and all in my layman's understanding): Copyright notices,
when they were required at all (most recently in the UCC), were never
valid with “(c) Person Name”. That is, “(c)” doesn't mean “c
In message <20090408212528.ga19...@thorin>, Robert Millan
writes
[ Adding Hubert Figuiere (gnote upstream) to CC, note that he's probably not
subscribed ]
Hi Anthony,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:20:44PM +0100, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message <20090408194833.ga5...@thorin>, Robert Milla
[ Adding Hubert Figuiere (gnote upstream) to CC, note that he's probably not
subscribed ]
Hi Anthony,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 09:20:44PM +0100, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> In message <20090408194833.ga5...@thorin>, Robert Millan
> writes
>>> and a
>>> clear violation of Tomboy's license.
>
In message <20090408194833.ga5...@thorin>, Robert Millan
writes
and a
clear violation of Tomboy's license.
Notice license and copyright statements are two separate issues. AFAIK
LGPL doesn't explicitly require that a license notice is preserved mixing
code with other licenses like the BSD lic
* MJ Ray:
> The linked common licence is the modified BSD licence AFAIK, so I
> don't feel that either of those would be accurate. I've added the
> unmodified BSD licence with its own entry, along the lines of the wiki
> description. I'm pretty sure it's in debian.
Yes, the DFSG originally refer
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:30:30PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> >
> > If there's a problem, we'll get it sorted out, but I need more specific
> > info on your findings; the example you pasted shows a file with nor
> > copyright statement neither license information (from tomboy) and one
> > with bo
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:36:29PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > I'd happily update http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ but I can't
> > see how it makes it sounds as if 4-clause BSD wouldn't meet DFSG. Can
> > you clarify?
[...]
> Licenses currently found in Debian main include:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 21:05 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hi Jo,
>
> Nice to see your newly found interest in C++ packages (though, not
> completely unexpected) :-)
Nothing wrong with C++ in moderation. My last ITP was a C++ browser
plugin.
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:26:18PM +0100, Jo Shields
Hi Jo,
Nice to see your newly found interest in C++ packages (though, not
completely unexpected) :-)
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:26:18PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> Please note that this project in its current form contains swathes of
> major copyright violations and cannot be uploaded to Debian -
9 matches
Mail list logo
