Re: Which license am I looking for?

2009-01-25 Thread MJ Ray
Adam Sampson wrote: > This warning isn't as silly as it sounds: peanuts are legumes rather > than nuts, so if you're allergic to nuts you may still be able to eat Bad example, but the same warning is on Sainsbury's Shelled Walnuts 300g, which I'm pretty sure are nuts and can be looked up on http:

Re: Analysis of the Free Art License 1.3

2009-01-25 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:41:18 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > Since version 1.2 included an auto-upgrade clause, I was very > interested in analyzing the version 1.3, in the hope that the > previously mentioned issues could be fixed with this new license text. Here's my own comments. As usual,

Analysis of the Free Art License 1.3

2009-01-25 Thread Francesco Poli
Hello everyone, back on April 2006, we discussed the Free Art License version 1.2: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/04/msg00257.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/04/msg00259.html My own conclusion was that this license seemed to be *intended* to be a free copyleft one (but in