On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:08:16PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:13:48AM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:39:45AM -0800, Michael Crawford wrote:
> >>>It says "by Charlton Harrison" and he documented when the releases
> >>>were on his websi
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:08:24 +0100 Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Miriam Ruiz:
>
> > We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
> > users can filter out the ones they don't wont easily. I don't object
> > to having AGPL in Debian, but I don't plan to install anything under
I'll only comment on point 1, the use fee, because I think others have
answered the other questions and found solutions for the problem.
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We do not think that this is a severe enough problem to restrict the
> freeness of a work licensed using the AGPL.
>
* Miriam Ruiz:
> We should somehow tag those conflictive licenses with debtags, so that
> users can filter out the ones they don't wont easily. I don't object
> to having AGPL in Debian, but I don't plan to install anything under
> that license in my system, and AFAIK there are other people in the
2008/12/2 Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Resource requirements have not traditionally been considered factors
> in judging software freeness.
>
> But you are right that the AGPL (and perhaps the GPL version 3 as
> well) fail my personal test for DRM-ness: A feature which, once added,
> cann
* Bernhard R. Link:
> * Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081201 13:37]:
>> * Bernhard R. Link:
>> > And you think that once there will be hundreds of such renamed projects
>> > of the same program which only have some patches that are not very
>> > usefull for most people because of having to s
* Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081201 13:37]:
> * Bernhard R. Link:
> > And you think that once there will be hundreds of such renamed projects
> > of the same program which only have some patches that are not very
> > usefull for most people because of having to specific solutions and no
>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 01:13:48AM -0800, Ryan Niebur wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:39:45AM -0800, Michael Crawford wrote:
>>>It says "by Charlton Harrison" and he documented when the releases
>>>were on his website. From that could I just construct a copyright
>>>notice and use that?
>>
>>My
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008, Michael Crawford wrote:
> > It says "by Charlton Harrison" and he documented when the releases
> > were on his website. From that could I just construct a copyright
> > notice and use that?
>
> My understanding is that "copyright descends on a work the instant it
> is created
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/12/2 Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Ok, well in that case I'll pass I'm already bothering legal way too often
>> with games related questions.
>
> It would be better to have a name upstream likes, but if the name
2008/12/2 Filippo Argiolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Miriam, probably you should forward them my last reply too.
Yup, sorry, I wrote my email before yours.
> As I said I'm open to a name change or a suggestion.
> The game it's been in Debian for more than one year now and no one
> ever complain
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:20, Filippo Argiolas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could have continued to ignore it but *I* choosed to resume this
> issue because I'm a bit worried about it, so, please stop talking
> about unilateral changes or things like that.
Again, there has been a misunderstandi
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> It would be better to have a name upstream likes, but if the name is
> not legally safe for Fedora, it won't be for Debian either and
> ignoring the problem won't fix it.
>From the limited context you've provided, there's nothing to in
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 12:39:45AM -0800, Michael Crawford wrote:
> > It says "by Charlton Harrison" and he documented when the releases
> > were on his website. From that could I just construct a copyright
> > notice and use that?
>
> My understanding is that "copyright descends on a work the ins
2008/12/2 Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, well in that case I'll pass I'm already bothering legal way too often
> with games related questions.
It would be better to have a name upstream likes, but if the name is
not legally safe for Fedora, it won't be for Debian either and
ignoring the
> It says "by Charlton Harrison" and he documented when the releases
> were on his website. From that could I just construct a copyright
> notice and use that?
My understanding is that "copyright descends on a work the instant it
is created." So the release dates could reasonably serve to indicat
Hi,
Lintian is complaining to me because there isn't a "copyright notice"
in the debian/copyright file. Looking through the source, there isn't
a copyright notice for crip itself (there is for another included
file, but that's from a different author and everything).
It says "by Charlton Harrison
17 matches
Mail list logo
