On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 12:03:04 +0200 Miriam Ruiz wrote:
[...]
> 4c) Through a public server, having to identify myself (thus, I
> wouldn't be able to remain anonymous)
The real problem would not be anonymity (which could be reached via
technical measures: onion routing, anonymous remailers, nym
serv
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 05:39:59 -0400 Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:00:58 +0200
> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > The problem is:
> > what happens if the VCS goes off-line for one afternoon
> > (or for one night, for a couple of days, for a week, ..., forever)?
>
2008/9/1 Christofer C. Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The AGPLv3 requires you to re-export that code in the event that you
> modify server software using it -- even if exporting crypto is illegal
> for you.
This is not an issue. A license can't force you to do something that
contradicts a higher law.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Miriam Ruiz writes ("Is AGPLv3 DFSG-free?"):
> > Do you think AGPLv3 is DFSG-free?
>
> Yes. The source-transmission requirement is hardly onerous,
It's probably not onerous, but it's certainly non-trivial. The class
of things that fall under Correspondin
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> 2008/9/1 Christofer C. Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The AGPLv3 requires you to re-export that code in the event that you
> > modify server software using it -- even if exporting crypto is illegal
> > for you.
>
> This is not an issue. A licens
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008, Arc Riley wrote:
> As an American, I cannot export cryptographic software. As a result,
> I don't work on it.
>
> That doesn't prevent me from building or modifying software that
> utilizes those components, as those components are imported.
You still have to arrange to conve
"Arc Riley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These are technical challenges, not legal problems, and will be solved by the
> community as the need arises. I'd say in the next year or two free VCS
> services will allow people to register new branches to existing projects.
There is already a limited
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 01:49:38PM -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> 2008/9/1 Christofer C. Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The AGPLv3 requires you to re-export that code in the event that you
> > modify server software using it -- even if exporting crypto is illegal
> > for you.
> This is not
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Arc Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As an American, I cannot export cryptographic software. As a result, I
> don't work on it.
>
> That doesn't prevent me from building or modifying software that utilizes
> those components, as those components are imported.
A
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, but they'll have your IP, which is (at least in my country)
> personal information. In any case it is enough for someone to be able
> to find you, so you won't be really anonymous. Think about China, for
> example
2008/9/1 Arc Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2) Spam everyone I interact with, saying the client I'm using and how
>> to get the full source code.
>
> The license does not say you must advertise, only that you "must prominently
> offer". In your example of an IRC network, providing a source URL wit
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Some of the problems might be important anyway. I'll sum up my
> personal concerns. Say I want to create a 3D virtual world based on
> the IRC network, using PySoy as the base framework for that, PySoy
> being AGPLv3 will f
2008/9/1 Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> AGPLv3 may or may not be free, but as the discussion goes on I am
> finding the arguments against it less credible as they seem to be
> invoking 'problems' that are not really problems.
Some of the problems might be important anyway. I'll sum up my
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:50:51 +0100
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the previously-available modified copy that you are using goes
> offline, does one then have to post the source?
>
The same as with the GPL. If upstream disappears you have to stop
distributing unless you provide the s
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:56:56 +0200
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:15:48 -0400 Arc Riley wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Francesco Poli
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > > The problem is:
> > > what happens if the VCS goes off-line for one aft
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:00:58 +0200
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:53:09 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > MJ Ray wrote:
> > > Is there a generally-accepted statement from FSF that a free VCS
> > > solution is sufficient, or is this interpretation only valid
Comunichiamo che la vs mail è stata da voi comunicata, oppure acquisita
nell'esercizio della propria attività statutaria, e che sarà trattata secondo
quanto previsto dalla corrente legislazione. Se così non fosse e qualora la
nostra mail non risultasse di vostro interesse ci scusiamo per il dist
17 matches
Mail list logo
