Franklin PIAT schrieb:
I removed the "Truecrypt license" from the page because :
* This license is specific to a single package. A bug might me more
appropriate to track that. (IMHO).
A bug? On which bug tracker? How to fix it?
* The state of that license is currently "undecided", it doesn'
Hello,
Foreword : I'm not part of the debian-legal team. I'm just taking care
of keeping the wiki clean.
I removed the "Truecrypt license" from the page because :
* This license is specific to a single package. A bug might me more
appropriate to track that. (IMHO).
* The state of that license i
This one time, at band camp, Michael Reichenbach said:
> Hi!
>
> The license has been already discussed on the malinglist with opinions
> 'DFSG-compatible' and 'not DFSG-compatible'.
>
> I added it to the wiki.
> http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses?action=show#head-4aa606633f3372dc9d5087b69c2f4
Francesco Poli schrieb:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:57:30 +0200 Michael Reichenbach wrote:
Hi!
The license has been already discussed on the malinglist with opinions
'DFSG-compatible' and 'not DFSG-compatible'.
I added it to the wiki.
http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses?action=show#head-4aa6066
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:57:30 +0200 Michael Reichenbach wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The license has been already discussed on the malinglist with opinions
> 'DFSG-compatible' and 'not DFSG-compatible'.
>
> I added it to the wiki.
> http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses?action=show#head-4aa606633f3372dc9d508
Hi!
The license has been already discussed on the malinglist with opinions
'DFSG-compatible' and 'not DFSG-compatible'.
I added it to the wiki.
http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses?action=show#head-4aa606633f3372dc9d5087b69c2f40d06bcd3c2d
How to get a final / official verdict about it?
-mr
6 matches
Mail list logo