Re: Liberation Font License revisited

2008-04-27 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:56:25 +0200 Hendrik Weimer wrote: > Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:41:08 +0200 Hendrik Weimer wrote: > > > >> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > >> > Did you point RMS' message [4] out to the FSF when you contacte

Re: Liberation Font License revisited

2008-04-27 Thread Hendrik Weimer
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:41:08 +0200 Hendrik Weimer wrote: > >> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] >> > Did you point RMS' message [4] out to the FSF when you contacted them? >> >> I did. > > And how did they explain the difference in the

Re: Review of license

2008-04-27 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:25:20 -0400 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > [ Please keep me in the CC since I am not subscribed to -legal ] Done. > > I was recently asked to sponsor an upload of a package that carries the > below license. Is this license acceptable for main? [...] The license you quoted