On Thursday 28 February 2008 05:05:00 pm Ben Finney wrote:
> Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > -->8--
> > Q: I've flouted your advice and written a new license. I strongly
> > believe that it conforms to the DFSG and is a free software license.
> > People
On Thursday 28 February 2008 04:09:34 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:01:34 -0800 Sean Kellogg wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 February 2008 10:19:26 am Walter Landry wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html
> >
> > Now this is a page I remember... it is in
Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -->8--
> Q: I've flouted your advice and written a new license. I strongly
> believe that it conforms to the DFSG and is a free software license.
> People on debian-legal don't seem to agree though. They give
> explanations
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:01:34 -0800 Sean Kellogg wrote:
> On Thursday 28 February 2008 10:19:26 am Walter Landry wrote:
[...]
> > http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html
>
> Now this is a page I remember... it is indelibly rooted in my mind because of
> this fun exchange:
>
> -
On 28/02/2008, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
> As I said, during NM, every candidate must do this, unless I am
> misunderstanding something, but they most point out what each test
> tries to address in DFSG.
AFAICT, there's no must. It depends on whether the application manager
follows t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28-02-2008 13:40, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> Ahhmm?! I've been subscribed to d-l for around five years now and I
> have never seen anyone tie a test to a DFSG point even though folks
> have asked. In fact, it wasn't until someone posted the wikipedia
On Thursday 28 February 2008 11:27:15 am Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080228 20:01]:
> > On Thursday 28 February 2008 10:19:26 am Walter Landry wrote:
> > > You just have not been around long enough ;) The desert island test
> > > was first mentioned in 2002 in
> >
* Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080228 20:01]:
> On Thursday 28 February 2008 10:19:26 am Walter Landry wrote:
> > You just have not been around long enough ;) The desert island test
> > was first mentioned in 2002 in
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/01/msg00010.html
>
> An
On Thursday 28 February 2008 10:19:26 am Walter Landry wrote:
> You just have not been around long enough ;) The desert island test
> was first mentioned in 2002 in
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/01/msg00010.html
An actual cite to the DFSG, but it is from before my time... of cou
Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 February 2008 07:21:27 pm Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
> (faw) wrote:
> > On 27-02-2008 23:13, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 27 February 2008 04:20:56 pm Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > >> So long as you add the rider that some of the debi
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 07:21:27 pm Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
(faw) wrote:
> On 27-02-2008 23:13, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 February 2008 04:20:56 pm Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> So long as you add the rider that some of the debian-legal
> >> subscribers believe it (and some of
11 matches
Mail list logo
