Hi!
* David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080224 13:04]:
> I believe that the copyright notice should carry the real name of the author,
> shouldn't it?
Uhm... to best of my knowledge: No. Think at the dissident test.
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
David Paleino wrote:
> I believe that the copyright notice should carry the real name of the author,
> shouldn't it?
Most of the world doesn't have rules about copyright notices, so
there it doesn't matter what you put in such a notice. The only complication
you may encounter is that copyright law
Mathieu Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The already a discution[1] which was opened about this license, but I
> didn't find if this license is DFSG complient.
I have reviewed the discussion of
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/09/msg00132.html
In my opinion, this license:
+ permits free redi
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:04:17 +0100 David Paleino wrote:
[...]
> I contacted upstream to know his real name, in order to put it in
> debian/copyright, but he wishes to be known as "Master Kernel" (that is the
> name provided in the sources). Is that possible?
To the best of my knowledge, yes, that
Hi,
I'd like to package a software [1], but I'm encountering possible copyright
issues. I contacted upstream to know his real name, in order to put it in
debian/copyright, but he wishes to be known as "Master Kernel" (that is the
name provided in the sources). Is that possible?
He also asked me whe
5 matches
Mail list logo
