On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:02:55AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> If this is the case, may I claim that I am a lawful acquirer of the
> copy that consists of network packets? At that point, I may claim
> that the law allows me to create a copy onto my hard-drive because
> it's "necessary for the us
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:11:26 + John Halton wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 07:50:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I would say that, if I download software from a website, I am not
> > the one who's creating the new copy: the web server is doing so, to
> > satisfy my request, and the web
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 07:50:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I would say that, if I download software from a website, I am not
> the one who's creating the new copy: the web server is doing so, to
> satisfy my request, and the web server is operated by the copyright
> holder of the software (o
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On the other hand, maybe the Open Cascade license counts as an
> agreement, since the copyright holder says that you have to accept
> the license in order to download the software (i.e.: in order to become
> a lawful acquirer). Then, after you accepted the license, you are
4 matches
Mail list logo