On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:15:00AM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > To put it another way: whatever one thinks of the Debian logo policy,
> > > it seems harsh on OP to make him comply with a stricter interpretation
> > > of the DFSG than the Debian pr
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:15:00 +0100 Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > To put it another way: whatever one thinks of the Debian logo
> > > policy, it seems harsh on OP to make him comply with a stricter
> > > interpretation of the DFSG than the Debian project
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > To put it another way: whatever one thinks of the Debian logo policy,
> > it seems harsh on OP to make him comply with a stricter interpretation
> > of the DFSG than the Debian project currently applies to its own logo.
>
> The whole reason the lice
On Dec 2, 2007 2:36 AM, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is the contact address?
STIX Fonts Project Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I failed to find any e-mail address on the website[1].
http://www.stixfonts.org/Readme.txt
http://bugs.debian.org/449205
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.d
4 matches
Mail list logo
