On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 07:33:03PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> However as already written, upstream solution, as mine, suffers the
> RFC parts in the function descriptions. Back in October 2006, Pierre
> Thierry asked if these parts could be allowed even if not-free [4],
> but no one answered him.
Hello all!
Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed to the list. Moreover, please keep at
least the bug entry cc:ed, so people don't need to search in other
locations.
I need some legal advices about one of my packages, rfc2109 [1][2].
The main problem is that rfc2109.lisp contains verbatim parts of
R
2 matches
Mail list logo
